VoteFirst is feature request software with one defining feature: it weights votes by revenue. Connect Stripe and each vote is multiplied by the voter's monthly recurring revenue, so the requests that rise to the top are the ones your paying customers care about. It also ships with a changelog, public roadmap, custom domains, and a flat price that does not move when your board gets popular.
Best for: B2B SaaS teams that want their roadmap to reflect revenue, not just vote volume.
Pros
- Revenue weighted voting through Stripe, unique on this list at this price
- Flat pricing with unlimited voters and boards
- Changelog, public roadmap, custom domains, API, and webhooks included
- Anonymous voting to maximize the feedback you collect
Cons
- English only today, with no native mobile app
- Newer and smaller than Canny, with fewer prebuilt integrations
- Revenue weighting depends on a Stripe or Paddle connection
$4.50/mo Lite, $19.50/mo Pro, flat. 30 day free trial.
Canny is the most mature, polished feature request platform available, and for many teams it is the default. It collects requests, builds public roadmaps, ships a changelog, and integrates deeply with tools like Intercom, Jira, and Salesforce. If you want a proven all rounder and pricing is not a concern, Canny is hard to fault.
Best for: Teams that want a mature, well integrated platform and can absorb pricing that scales.
Pros
- Polished, reliable, and widely adopted
- Deep integrations with Intercom, Jira, Salesforce, and more
- Changelog and public roadmap built in
- Free tier to get started
Cons
- Pricing scales with tracked users and climbs quickly
- Canny branding only disappears on higher tiers
- Ranks by raw votes, with no revenue based prioritization
Free tier available, paid from around $19/mo and scaling with usage.
Read the full Canny comparison
Productboard is a complete product management suite. Feature requests are one input among many that feed into prioritization frameworks, objectives, and detailed roadmaps. It is the most powerful option here for large teams, and overkill for anyone who just wants a voting board.
Best for: Large product organizations that need full product management, not just feedback.
Pros
- Robust prioritization frameworks and objective mapping
- Strong roadmap and planning capabilities
- Integrates with the wider product and engineering stack
Cons
- Per maker pricing grows with team size
- Heavy for simple feedback collection
- No built in changelog and no revenue weighting
Free tier available, paid from around $19/mo per maker.
Read the full Productboard comparison
Feature Upvote keeps things radically simple: a clean public board where users post and vote, with anonymous voting and almost no configuration. It is a favorite of game studios and teams that want exactly one board and nothing more.
Best for: Teams that want a single, dead simple public board.
Pros
- Fast to set up with minimal configuration
- Anonymous voting out of the box
- Clean, distraction free boards
Cons
- No built in changelog
- Per board pricing adds up across multiple products
- No public API
From around $39/mo per board on annual billing, no free tier.
Read the full Feature Upvote comparison
Nolt is a clean, design forward single board tool that is easy to share and pleasant to use. It pairs well with third party integrations and suits small teams that want something more polished than a shared document without much setup.
Best for: Small teams that want one attractive, shareable board.
Pros
- Modern, well designed interface
- Good integrations for its size
- Public roadmap and API available
Cons
- No built in changelog
- Entry plan limited to a single board
- No revenue based ranking
From around $29/mo on annual billing, no free tier.
Read the full Nolt comparison
Sleekplan packs a feedback board, changelog, and roadmap into one low cost tool with a free tier. It is a practical choice for early stage teams that want the complete feedback loop without spending much.
Best for: Early stage teams that want an affordable all in one.
Pros
- Free tier and low entry pricing
- Changelog and roadmap included
- Covers the full feedback loop
Cons
- Interface feels dated compared to newer tools
- Some features locked behind the Business plan
- No revenue based prioritization
Free tier available, paid from around $13/mo on annual billing.
Read the full Sleekplan comparison
Fider is open source feature request software you can self host for free. For technical teams that want to own their data and infrastructure, it offers full control. You trade convenience for that control, since hosting and maintenance are on you.
Best for: Technical teams that want to self host and own their data.
Pros
- Open source and free to self host
- Complete control over data and hosting
- Clean, focused voting
Cons
- You own hosting, updates, and maintenance
- No built in changelog or roadmap in the core product
- Fewer convenience features than hosted tools
Free to self host, managed hosting from around $25/mo.
Read the full Fider comparison