Feature request software
Eight different billing units, the three questions that decide it, and who each tool is actually for.
Read itCanny alternatives
What a tracked user costs at 100, 1,000 and 5,000, and seven products that count something else.
Read itFree feedback tools
Every published free plan in the field, and the exact thing each one stops at.
Read itFeedback tools that stopped answering
Seven products no longer answer at their own address. Three have no DNS record at all.
Read itOpen source feedback tools
Six boards read in their own repositories. One is archived and two report no standard licence.
Read itProduct roadmap software
Sorted by who is allowed to look at the roadmap, because one of them cannot show a customer at all.
Read itChangelog tools
Which ones confirm email delivery on their own site, which confirm a feed, and what each one costs.
Read itIdea management software
Seven tools that use the phrase, with the unit each one bills on and what it costs.
Read itUser feedback tools
Thirty two tools grouped by the unit on the invoice, because that is what decides whether your bill grows.
Read itEnterprise feedback management
Six gates a security review asks about. Only seven of thirty two vendors name SAML at all.
Read itEvery shortlist above was built by opening each vendor's own pages and writing down what was on them, with the date on the page. None of them was assembled from another shortlist, which is why the counts sometimes disagree with lists you will find elsewhere.
Where a vendor publishes nothing on a question, the entry says so. That is an absence of evidence on a marketing site, never proof that the software cannot do the thing.
If you want prices rather than shortlists, the alternatives index puts every tool and the unit it bills on in one table. If you have already narrowed it to two, the head to head pages work the arithmetic.