A product feedback glossary grouped by decision, not by letter

This product feedback glossary holds thirty three entries, and they are grouped below by the decision they belong to rather than sorted by first letter. An alphabetical list is a list you can only use if you already know the word.

Each entry answers its own term in its first sentence and then says what the term hides, because most of the vocabulary in this category is a real idea wearing a word that flatters it.

What is the thing a customer sends you?

Six terms, and the distinctions between them decide what you are allowed to do with each.

The public board a visitor reads, three columns wide, each request carrying its vote count, its views and its comment count
The public board, where anyone can post and vote without an account.

What is the thing you decide with?

Seven terms, and six of them are arithmetic wearing a name.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.

The same board ordered by priority, which is demand divided by effort, so a smaller request with less demand sits above a large one with more
The same board, ordered by demand divided by effort.

What is the list you decide over?

Five terms about the place requests wait.

What do you show people afterwards?

Six terms, and this is the half of the category most teams underuse.

The public changelog, one card per release, each listing the improvements, new features and fixes that went out in it
The public changelog, one card per release.

What are the research habits around it?

Four terms that describe how the feedback gets collected in the first place.

What are the numbers people put beside it?

Five terms from the measurement side, where the category borrows most heavily from elsewhere.

One voter opened, showing their votes, comments and views, when they were first and last seen, the billing system they came from, and the private notes only the team sees
One voter: what they voted for, and your private notes.

Why is this not alphabetical?

Because nobody arrives at a glossary knowing the word they need.

A reader who already knows the term goes straight to its page from a search result and never sees this one.

A reader who arrives here is holding a problem rather than a word, and the six groups above are the six problems. That is the only arrangement that helps the second reader without hurting the first.

Related reading

Every feature on the board, and which plan it is on Four use cases for a feedback board, and the trade in each Every feedback tool's real price, and the unit it bills