Feedback tool pricing: 190 pricing pages, grouped by what each does

Feedback tool pricing has one page per vendor here, one hundred ninety of them, each read on the vendor's own site on the day it was written. They are grouped below by what their pricing page actually does, because that turns out to matter more than the number on it.

Entry prices for thirty two feedback tools are also published as one CSV, with the date and the address each row was read at. Nine of these vendors publish no figure a reader can see. One shows a different set of plans on different loads.

How central each of these domains is on the web's link graph is published as a second file. Which of the fifty five directories listing these vendors actually pass link credit is published as a third, read on 16 September 2026. Three charge for the people who read the board rather than the people who run it. None of that is visible from a price comparison, and all of it changes the bill.

Which ones publish a flat number you can plan around?

Thirty four, and these are the pages where the figure on the card is close to the figure on the invoice.

  • Features.Vote, nine or twenty nine and no meter at all.
  • LoopedIn, free, fifteen, thirty or fifty a month, twelve, twenty four or forty billed yearly, with unlimited tracked users on every plan.
  • Sleekplan, thirteen dollars a month with single sign on, an API and webhooks on that tier.
  • Upvoty, fifteen dollars a month, and three lines on the cheapest card are crossed out.
  • Noora, fourteen billed yearly or twenty nine monthly, with team members and tracked contacts unlimited on every plan.
  • Supahub, nothing for one board and one admin, then fifteen.
  • FeedBear, nineteen for one board and one team member, and no free tier.
  • ProductLift, nineteen for two admins and forty nine for the plan that reads Stripe.
  • Frill, from twenty two, with colleagues and tracked users both unlimited on the cheapest plan.
  • UserJot, nothing for two boards, then twenty nine.
  • Tally, a form builder free for unlimited forms and submissions, then twenty nine a month on Pro, the same since 2021, with its own feature requests on UserJot.
  • Koala Feedback, nothing for three boards and one admin, then twenty nine billed yearly for five admins and a custom domain.
  • Nolt, flat per board with unlimited users, and there are two Nolts at two addresses.
  • Rapidr, forty nine for five colleagues, and an MRR filter their own table marks coming soon.
  • Feature Upvote, forty nine dollars a board with every feature on both tiers.
  • Gleap, forty nine for one seat and one project with no feature requests, and a hundred and forty nine for Team, the first plan with requests and votes.
  • Userback, twenty nine billed annually for five seats, and the feature portal is thirty one more on top.
  • Usersnap, forty nine billed yearly for two seats, and two hundred and nine for Professional, the first plan with a public voting board.
  • Marker.io, thirty nine billed yearly for three users, and a hundred and forty nine for Team, the first plan with session replay and Jira.
  • BugHerd, fifty a month for five members, and a hundred and fifty for Premium, the first plan with Jira.
  • Productroad, nine dollars for one team member, before the nine per fifty tracked users starts.
  • Noticeable, twenty four billed annually, and the second person who can publish costs fifty more.
  • Headway, nothing for unlimited changelogs, and twenty nine a month for Pro with a custom domain, a price unchanged since 2018.
  • Quackback, nothing for one seat and fifty posts, then twenty nine a month billed yearly, or thirty seven monthly, for five seats.
  • ProdCamp, free for two admins, and then ninety nine with nothing in between.
  • HYPE Boards, formerly Viima, seventy nine euros for ten people and two boards.
  • Feedbucket, forty nine a month for two team members or eighty nine for twenty five, with clients, projects and feedback unlimited on both.
  • Changelogfy, by the project, forty nine a month billed yearly or fifty nine monthly for a feedback board, changelog and knowledge base, with no free plan since 2024.
  • ClearFlask, free and open source on your own server up to a hundred posts, nine a month for a self host license, twenty nine on its cloud, after five pricing models since 2021.
  • Formstack, eighty three a month billed yearly for one builder user and twenty five forms, two hundred fifty on Suite for three users with documents and signatures.
  • Microsoft Clarity, nothing at all, with no paid version, capped at a hundred thousand sessions a project a day.
  • Suggested, one plan at forty nine a month with every feature, private feedback and single sign on included, the same number since 2020.
  • Ybug, ten euros a month billed yearly for three projects and three team members, and forty seven for fifteen, the same prices since 2019.
  • Per seat or flat, the arithmetic side by side at four team sizes.

What this costs

Lite

$9 /mo

1 project, 1 roadmap Changelog and weighted voting No API, team or custom domain
Start the trial

Lifetime

$999 once

Everything in Pro Every future Pro feature Paid once, never renewed
Buy it outright

Fourteen day trial of Pro, card asked for at signup. Nothing here counts the people who vote, so the bill does not move when the board starts working. The long version, with what happens if you stop paying.

Which ones meter something that grows?

One hundred twenty two, and this is the group where the second year costs more than the first without you changing anything.

  • FeatureOS, two counters on one plan, five boards and five seats, and fifteen a month for each extra of either.
  • Featurebase, per seat, with one switch inside the plan card deciding which of two numbers you see.
  • Savio, per paid user, with free users unlimited.
  • Aha!, per user with a three seat minimum on Ideas, and viewers are charged.
  • Beamer, on monthly active users, with the feedback board a separate add on.
  • AnnounceKit, per product, with feature requests now its own standalone product rather than a higher tier of the changelog.
  • Jira Product Discovery, per creator, where a contributor is free and a creator is not.
  • Roadmunk, two meters on one list, with editors and reviewers priced separately.
  • LaunchNotes, per page, with the second page and the third user both unpriced.
  • Olvy, on how much feedback you may analyse, at a hundred items on the sixty dollar plan.
  • Harvestr, per editor with contributors free, and a second allowance counting AI categorisations.
  • Productlane, per user, with each AI resolution past the allowance charged at seventy nine cents.
  • Craft.io, per editor, where the step from Starter to Pro is roughly four times.
  • Ideanote, per user with a hard cap at fifty, and a quoted contract above it.
  • Formbricks, on survey responses, two thousand a month on the eighty nine dollar Pro plan, and free to self host.
  • Userpilot, on monthly active users, two hundred and ninety nine to 2,000 of them, and Growth from eight hundred and forty nine through a demo.
  • UserGuiding, on monthly active users, with feature requests from the three hundred and forty nine dollar Growth plan billed yearly.
  • Qualaroo, on email sends and pageviews, with its website and in product surveys from the Business plan at forty nine ninety nine a month billed yearly.
  • Survicate, on survey responses, fifty six a month billed yearly for a hundred, with overage at eighty nine cents a response only on the monthly Starter plan.
  • Hotjar, now sold as Contentsquare, on sessions for heatmaps and on responses for surveys, ninety nine a month for five hundred responses, up from seventy nine a year ago.
  • Pastel, on users and canvases, twenty nine a month billed yearly for two users and three canvases, and ninety nine for five users on Team, the first plan with integrations.
  • Jam, per creator, free for five creators and thirty Jams a month, then fourteen a creator billed yearly, with viewers free on every plan.
  • Linear, per member of the workspace, free to 250 issues, then ten or sixteen a user billed yearly, with customer requests logged on every plan and no board customers can see.
  • Product Fruits, on monthly active users, one hundred and eleven a month billed yearly for 1,500 users on Starter, rising to four hundred and ninety nine monthly at 20,000.
  • Userflow, on monthly active users, five hundred a month for 1,000 on Adoption Studio, or four hundred billed yearly, then thirty to ten a month for each further thousand.
  • Chameleon, on monthly tracked users, seven hundred and fifty a month on Pro for 5,000, and one thousand seven hundred and fifty billed yearly on Growth, which turns cheaper than Pro from 25,000.
  • MarkUp.io, by the MarkUp, seventy nine dollars a month for fifty sites or files to review, after five years with a free plan and unlimited MarkUps on Pro.
  • zipBoard, by the digital asset, from ninety nine a month for twenty on Team, and Agency's allowance halved to fifty at the same price this year.
  • Lyssna, formerly UsabilityHub, on seats and studies, free for three seats, then one hundred and ninety nine a month on Growth, with the research panel paid apart.
  • Optimal Workshop, by the study, a hundred and ninety nine a month billed yearly for five studies a year, where the same price bought unlimited studies until the summer of 2025.
  • Convas, free to twenty five tracked users, then fifteen a month for each hundred, and a tracked user never resets.
  • Bird Eats Bug, by the team member, fifty a month on Starter for five, ten for each one after, and now sold by BrowserStack as Bug Capture.
  • Mopinion, by channel and traffic, from two hundred and seventy nine euros a month billed yearly for one site of half a million pageviews, sized by a calculator.
  • Shake, by the seat and the app, free for three seats and twenty bug reports a month, then two hundred billed yearly for twenty five seats, up a quarter this year.
  • Atarim, by the AI credit, free for two hundred once, then sixty seven a month for five thousand, with more from ten dollars a thousand and no seat charge.
  • Mouseflow, by the recorded session, free for five hundred a month, then twenty five euros billed yearly for five thousand, and tracking stops when the month's sessions run out.
  • Fillout, on form responses, free for a thousand a month with unlimited seats, then fifteen a month billed yearly for two thousand, and forms keep collecting past the limit.
  • Typeform, on form responses, free for ten a month, then twenty eight a month billed yearly for a hundred, and the pricing data charges for each response past the base.
  • Lucky Orange, by the session, thirty two a month billed yearly for three thousand five hundred, which bought five thousand in 2023, and its free plan went in 2026.
  • Retently, on surveys sent, ninety nine a month for two thousand five hundred on Ecommerce Basic, after the forty nine dollar step for a thousand went in 2026.
  • Crazy Egg, on tracked pageviews, twenty nine a month billed yearly for five thousand, which bought thirty thousand in 2023, and tracking pauses at the limit instead of billing more.
  • Jotform, on form submissions, thirty four a month billed yearly for a thousand, and Gold at ninety nine buys a tenth of the submissions it bought in 2018.
  • LogRocket, by the session, eighty three a month for ten thousand on Core, with its AI features held for Pro, which starts at about a thousand a month for two hundred and fifty thousand.
  • Condens, per contributor, fifteen euros a month for one on Lite, then five hundred a month paid yearly for five on Business, with nothing in between since its Team plan went in 2025.
  • SurveyMonkey, by the response, thirty nine a month billed yearly for fifteen thousand a year, while paying monthly now costs a hundred and twenty nine, and every response past the limit fifteen cents.
  • Paperform, by the submission, free for thirty a month, then forty nine a month billed yearly on Pro with unlimited submissions and seats.
  • Nicereply, by the survey response, seventy nine a month for a hundred responses and three users, four hundred forty nine for two thousand five hundred.
  • Simplesat, by the survey response, one hundred forty nine a month for three hundred responses, after a cut from a thousand at one hundred nineteen in October 2026.
  • SurveySparrow, by the yearly response, nineteen a month billed yearly for two thousand five hundred, with Starter and Business on sale at thirty nine and seventy nine.
  • Alchemer, by the seat, fifty five a user a month, or three hundred and fifteen a year billed yearly, for seventy five thousand responses a year, with every self serve plan capped at three users.
  • QuestionPro, by the user, ninety nine a month billed yearly for one user and twenty five thousand responses a year, or eighty three a user on Team Edition from five users, with a free plan capped at two hundred responses a survey.
  • Zoho Survey, by the response, seven forty two a month billed yearly for twelve thousand responses a survey, and on the higher plans paying monthly caps each survey while paying yearly does not.
  • SatisMeter, by the response received, one hundred ninety nine a month for a thousand, double the ninety nine it charged for the same thousand until 2022.
  • Wufoo, by the entry, twenty two a month for a thousand entries, with every cap unchanged since 2018 and every price raised in 2025.
  • Cognito Forms, by the entry, nineteen a month billed yearly for two thousand entries, with the free plan cut from five hundred entries to a hundred in 2026.
  • Customer Thermometer, by the click received, twenty nine a month for fifty responses, with unused ones rolling over and every plan priced the same since 2015.
  • Formsite, by the result stored on each form, twenty four ninety five a month for five forms of five hundred, with every monthly price unchanged since 2021.
  • LimeSurvey, by the response, thirty four euros a month for a thousand, or the software free to host yourself.
  • UserEcho, by the agent, nineteen a month billed annually or twenty five monthly, with the forum, helpdesk and chat in one plan since 2015.
  • 123FormBuilder, by the submission, thirty seven a month for five thousand, or half that billed yearly.
  • Lookback, by the session, two hundred ninety nine a year for ten, sold only by the year.
  • SurveyPlanet, by the license, twenty a month or one hundred eighty a year, with responses unlimited even on the free plan.
  • Crowdsignal, by the signal, free for two thousand five hundred answers, then fifteen a month billed yearly with no limit.
  • Userlytics, by the session and the seat, six hundred ninety nine a month paid annually for five seats, or thirty a session on Enterprise.
  • PostHog, by the event, free to a million events a month and then from five thousandths of a cent an event, with separate free allowances for replay, flags and surveys.
  • Crisp, by the workspace, free for two seats, then forty five to two hundred ninety five a month, with conversations unlimited and seats and customer profiles capped by plan.
  • Mixpanel, by the event, free to a million a month, then one hundred twenty a month at one and a half million up to sixteen hundred thirty five at twenty million billed yearly, and a quote past that.
  • Amplitude, by the event, free to two million a month, then Plus up to forty six hundred ninety two a month at seventy million billed yearly, with Growth and Enterprise by quote.
  • Help Scout, per user, free for five users, then twenty five, forty five or seventy five a user a month billed yearly, after a year priced by contacts in 2025.
  • Intercom, per seat and per AI outcome, nineteen, eighty five or one hundred thirty two a seat a month billed yearly, then ninety nine cents for each conversation its AI agent settles.
  • Zendesk, per agent, nineteen, fifty five or one hundred fifteen an agent a month billed yearly, with its Enterprise plan quoted and a middle tier dropped in 2026.
  • Freshdesk, per agent, nineteen, fifty five or eighty nine an agent a month billed yearly, with AI sessions sold in packs and a free plan that shrank from unlimited agents to none.
  • Front, per seat, twenty five, sixty five or one hundred five a seat a month billed yearly, with a ten seat cap on Starter and its AI agent from five cents a conversation.
  • Gorgias, by the ticket: ten, sixty, three hundred sixty or nine hundred dollars a month for 50 to 5,000 tickets, with its AI Agent priced by the automated interaction on top.
  • LiveChat, by the person, nineteen a month billed yearly for one user on Starter, then forty nine or seventy nine a person on Team or Business, with an AI product sold beside the plans.
  • Tidio, by the conversation a person answers, free for fifty a month, then twenty nine euros a month for a hundred on Starter, with its AI agent Lyro metered apart.
  • Zoho Desk, by the agent, free for three, then seven to forty euros an agent a month billed yearly across four plans.
  • tawk.to, by the add on, with the chat software free and AI Assist from twenty nine dollars, Whitelabel at twenty nine dollars a property and voice agents from forty nine dollars a month.
  • Jira Service Management, by the agent, free for three, then twenty five dollars an agent a month on Standard for a small team, falling as the team grows, with yearly bills set by agent band.
  • HelpCrunch, by the team member, twelve euros a month billed yearly for one on Basic, twenty on Pro, and four hundred and ninety five for unlimited team members, with AI conversations sold as an extension.
  • Hiver, by the seat, twenty five, fifty five or eighty five dollars a month billed yearly, bought two, then five, then in steps of five.
  • Olark, by the agent, twenty nine dollars an agent a month for live chat, or four hundred dollars a month billed yearly for the AI agent with one seat.
  • LiveAgent, by the agent, fifteen to sixty nine dollars an agent a month billed yearly, nineteen to eighty five billed monthly.
  • HappyFox, by the agent, twenty four to ninety nine dollars an agent a month billed yearly, or a flat fee from one thousand nine hundred ninety nine dollars a month for unlimited agents and a yearly ticket allowance.
  • Zoho SalesIQ, by the operator, seven to twenty euros an operator a month billed yearly from here, with a free plan for three operators.
  • Smartsupp, by the operator, a free plan for one, then seventeen dollars a month billed yearly for one operator up to eighty three for five.
  • Re:amaze, by the team member, twenty nine to sixty nine dollars a month, with AI Agent resolutions past a plan quota at eighty five cents each.
  • HubSpot Service Hub, by the seat, twenty to one hundred and fifty dollars a month in its catalog, with HubSpot Credits past a plan allowance at a cent each.
  • Freshchat, by the agent, nineteen to seventy nine dollars a month billed annually, with Freddy AI Agent sessions at forty nine dollars for each hundred.
  • User Interviews, by the recruited session, forty nine dollars each on Pay As You Go or thirty six inside a yearly block of 150, with B2B targeting doubling the rate and incentives on top.
  • Respondent, by the completed session, forty dollars for a consumer and eighty for B2B on pay as you go, stepping down with a yearly commitment, with incentives on top.
  • Prolific, on the participant reward a researcher sets, with a platform fee of 42.8 percent for a company or 33.3 percent for an academic or non profit team.
  • Groove, whose pricing page leads to Helply, by a monthly block of AI credits, forty nine to four hundred and forty nine dollars a month for unlimited users.
  • Great Question, by the seat, one hundred and twenty nine dollars a month for up to five seats, with outside recruiting and incentives billed per participant.
  • Userlike, by the seat count, with one seat free and Pro from eighty seven euros a month billed yearly at a minimum of three seats.
  • Kayako, by the resolved ticket, one dollar for each ticket its AI agent closes with no seat fee.
  • Chatwoot, by the agent, free for two agents on Cloud and from nineteen dollars an agent a month, with a free self hosted edition.
  • Trengo, by the conversation, from two hundred ninety nine euros a month billed yearly for ten users and six thousand conversations a year.
  • Missive, by the user, fourteen, twenty four or thirty six dollars a month billed yearly, with Starter capped at five users and Productive at fifty.
  • Zoho Forms, by the submission, free for five hundred a month, then from ten euros a month billed yearly for ten thousand.
  • eDesk, by the user and the online store, thirty nine to one hundred nineteen dollars a user a month billed yearly, with its AI agent at ninety nine cents an outcome.
  • Richpanel, by the agent on a yearly contract, sixty nine or ninety nine dollars a month billed yearly, with its AI agent at twenty cents a conversation.
  • Gmelius, by the user, nineteen, twenty five or forty dollars a month billed yearly, with Meli capped at five users and Growth at fifty.
  • Drag, by the user, twelve, eighteen or twenty four dollars a month billed yearly, with unlimited users on every plan and AI credits on Plus and Pro.
  • Helpwise, by the user, twelve, twenty three or thirty nine dollars a month billed yearly, with a two user minimum and Standard capped at ten.
  • Dixa, by the seat, eighty nine, one hundred thirty nine or one hundred seventy nine euros a month billed annually, with its AI agent at thirty five cents a conversation.
  • Keeping, by the user inside Gmail, fourteen, twenty four or forty nine dollars a month billed yearly, with a two user minimum and Essentials capped at ten.
  • Deskpro, by the agent, thirty nine, fifty nine or ninety nine dollars a month on Cloud with five, ten and twenty five agent minimums, and Private by quote.
  • Freshservice, by the agent for IT service management, nineteen, forty nine or ninety nine dollars a month billed annually, with Enterprise by quote and orchestration packs at two hundred fifty dollars for a thousand transactions.
  • Teamwork Desk, by the user, nine fifty, seventeen or thirty three euros a month billed yearly as rendered from the Czech Republic, with Starter capped at ten agents and a thirty day trial.
  • Chatra, by the agent, free for one agent and five chats a month, then twenty five or thirty three euros a month billed yearly as served to the Czech Republic.
  • Salesforce Service Cloud, by the user, twenty five dollars a month on Starter Suite up to five hundred fifty on Max, which carries 2.75 million Flex Credits a year.
  • Zammad, by the agent when hosted, seven, sixteen or twenty five euros a month billed annually, with AI at three cents a call and self hosted support from 2,999 euros a year.
  • JivoChat, by the agent, twenty eight, forty two or fifty six dollars a month billed annually and more billed monthly, beside a free plan and add ons from four dollars.
  • Looppanel, on editors and transcription hours, forty nine dollars a month for one editor on Solo, then three hundred and ninety five a month for five on Pro, with each extra editor at seventy five.
  • UXtweak, on user licenses and responses, free for one license and fifteen responses a month, then ninety two euros a month for one license on Business, billed annually.
  • Userbrain, on panel testers, forty nine dollars a month for three testers a month on Starter, two hundred and forty nine for ten on Plus, or eleven hundred dollars a year for thirty on Flex.
  • Loop11, on projects a month, one hundred and ninety nine dollars a month for three projects on Rapid Insights, or three hundred and ninety nine for ten on Pro, with a lower rate billed annually.
  • PlaybookUX, on panel participants, sixty five dollars a participant unmoderated and one hundred and fifteen moderated, with Scale at five thousand four hundred a year or Pro at eight thousand eight hundred as add ons.
  • Ruttl, per user, free for one project and five pages, then eighteen a user on Pro, after ten changes to its price list since 2021.
  • Refiner, on monthly active users, a hundred and forty nine a month for 5,000 on Essentials, up from ninety nine in August.
  • UseResponse, per support agent with two at least, forty nine a month each billed yearly, or seven thousand two hundred a year for five on your own server.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.

Which ones publish no number at all?

Thirty two, and each page says what is knowable instead of guessing at a figure.

  • airfocus, two plans that both read request pricing, with no free trial.
  • Pendo, custom on every paid plan, metered on monthly active users in your app.
  • ProdPad, a module builder that renders the figure in the browser, so a crawler sees nothing.
  • ProductPlan, one plan with everything in it and no figure anywhere.
  • UserVoice, a billing basis, a four to six week onboarding and a thirty day trial, and no number.
  • Ducalis, whose pricing page serves a calculator and no figure, while its home page prices six competitors.
  • Appcues, quote only since spring 2026, after a slider that priced it from three hundred dollars a month.
  • Sprig, quote only since summer 2026, after Starter at a hundred and seventy five a month billed yearly.
  • IdeaScale, quoted after a demo, while 83 US federal purchases on record show what agencies paid.
  • Dovetail, free for one project and quote only above it since February 2026, after Professional at fifteen dollars a user billed yearly.
  • Instabug, sold as Luciq on daily active users through a demo, after a single plan from forty five thousand dollars a year in 2025.
  • Zonka Feedback, quote only since late 2025 on responses and AI data credits, after Starter at forty nine a month billed yearly for 250 responses.
  • Delighted, no longer sold and forwarding to Qualtrics since June 2026, after nineteen to two hundred and forty nine a month on responses.
  • Zeda.io, from four hundred and ninety nine a month on a yearly commitment, the exact price by quote, read from the archive after its site failed.
  • Feedier, three plans sized by business units and feedback sources, all by quote, after printing prices from twenty to five hundred and eighty eight a month until 2020.
  • Usetiful, sold to Fullstory in November 2025 and now forwarding to its announcement, after sixty nine euros a month billed yearly for ten thousand assists.
  • Maze, free for one study a month and five seats, with every paid plan now behind a sales call, after a Starter plan at ninety nine a month in 2025.
  • Smartlook, no longer sold since May 2026 and shutting down in September 2027, after Pro from fifty five a month for five thousand sessions.
  • Kampsite, no longer served since its domain began redirecting to an auction listing, after Plus at nineteen a month for unlimited suggestions.
  • Fullstory, free to thirty thousand sessions a month, with every paid plan quoted since 2020 and the last printed prices, from eight hundred forty nine a month, in 2019.
  • Gladly, with no price on its page; the last archived copy, from September 2024, started at one hundred and eighty dollars a hero a month with ten heroes at least.
  • Askable, with no price on its page; its January 2024 copy charged one dollar thirty nine a credit, about a hundred credits for each in person participant, incentives included.
  • Kustomer, an ROI quiz in place of a price; its January 2026 archive copy priced Enterprise at eighty nine dollars a seat and Ultimate at one hundred and thirty nine.
  • Heap, a free plan for ten thousand sessions a month and no printed price above it; its January 2022 archive copy started Growth at three thousand six hundred dollars a year.
  • Dscout, three tiers sized by seats, activity credits and support with no printed price; its 2014 and 2015 archive copies charged six dollars a scout a mission.
  • Whatfix, a flat fee plus a license fee on headcount or monthly active users, with no figure printed in any copy since 2017.
  • WalkMe, by quote on both its employee and customer plans, last printed in 2012 at a cent an assist.
  • Qualtrics, eight products by quote, each naming interactions or employee count as its metric and none a number.
  • Medallia, by quote on one platform metered by the Experience Data Record, with no tier named in any copy since 2023.
  • Gainsight PX, by quote behind Request Pricing and Free Trial buttons, with a free plan for one hundred monthly active users in its 2018 and 2019 copies.
  • UserTesting, three plans and two ways to buy with no printed price; its 2014 archive copy charged forty nine dollars a video.
  • Marvin, a free plan for two full seats and three paid plans with no printed price; its February 2026 archive copy read fifty and one hundred dollars a user a month.

Which one is different on every load?

One, and it is the only page in the set that had to be opened repeatedly to describe.

Productboard shows a different set of plans on different loads. Across eight tries a free plan showed up twice and a fifty nine dollar figure was absent the other six times. The page records what was on the screen each time rather than picking the load that suited the writer.

Which one is free without a catch?

One, with a limit stated in the vendor's own words.

Fider is free, and the limit is a fair use policy of two hundred and fifty feedback items. Pro is twenty five dollars a month, or you host it yourself and pay for a server instead. That is the version, and VoteFirst's own Fider alternative page says most people reading it should stay.

Which one is free with a catch worth reading twice?

One, and the catch is on the reading rather than on the writing.

WishKit caps what a visitor can see rather than how much you can collect, so the board keeps taking requests and the fifth one is where a reader stops. That is an unusual place to put a wall and it is the whole of what the free plan decides.

The admin view of the board ordered by revenue, each card showing the monthly revenue behind the request beside its plain vote count
The same board, sorted by the revenue behind each request.

Do any of these vendors offer a discount?

Yes, and almost all of it is the same discount, being two months free for paying a year up front.

Annual billing is the only published discount across this set. Nobody in it publishes a startup rate, a non profit rate or an education rate on the page a visitor reads, and where a discount exists beyond the annual one it arrives through a sales conversation rather than through a price list.

Feature Upvote asks for a thousand dollars a year before it will take a bank transfer, which is a minimum rather than a discount and is worth knowing in the same breath.

VoteFirst does the same ordinary thing. Ninety dollars a year instead of nine dollars a month, and three hundred and ninety instead of thirty nine, which is two months free on both plans and both figures are on one page.

What payment methods do these tools accept?

A card, on every one of them, and an invoice once the number gets large enough.

Every vendor in this set sells by card through a checkout. Payment by invoice or bank transfer appears on the enterprise tier of the ones that have an enterprise tier, and the threshold is usually a sales conversation rather than a published figure.

VoteFirst takes a card. The checkout names no other payment method and there is no purchase order flow and no bank transfer at any plan, which is a real limit for a buyer whose finance team will not use one.

One voter opened, showing their votes, comments and views, when they were first and last seen, the billing system they came from, and the private notes only the team sees
One voter: what they voted for, and the revenue behind them.

Do you need a credit card to try any of these?

It varies, and VoteFirst asks for one.

Several vendors in this set start a trial without a card. This one does not. The trial runs fourteen days, a card is taken at signup, and the charge begins when the trial ends unless it is cancelled first.

That is stated here rather than buried, because a reader who finds out at the checkout has been misled by omission.

The reason is not a secret. A trial that asks for nothing fills up with accounts that were never going to buy, and this is a two person product with no sales team to sort them out afterwards.

Which shortlists compare one kind of tool side by side?

Many of the vendors above sell something other than a voting board, and each of those kinds has a shortlist that sets the same plans next to each other at a realistic size. Form builders are compared by what 1,000 and 10,000 responses a month cost, survey software by a year of responses and a team of five, and CSAT and NPS tools by what one answer costs. Session replay tools are compared by the session, product tour software by the monthly active user, bug reporting tools by what five people pay, user research tools by the seat and the study, participant recruitment by the session and the fee on each incentive, help desks by what five and twenty five people pay, shared inboxes by the same sizes and whether they run inside Gmail, live chat tools by the same two team sizes and the AI charge, and in app feedback widgets by what each one collects.

Where is the table with all the numbers in it?

On the alternatives hub, and there is exactly one of it.

Every price and every billing unit lives in one table on that page, rendered from one file, so the hub and the twenty five pages under this one cannot disagree. Repeating those numbers here would be a second copy that drifts the first time a vendor changes a plan.

If what you want is the arithmetic rather than the list, the tracked user pricing calculator runs it on your own size across the whole field.

And if you are not yet sure which kind of product you are pricing, five different things are sold under the phrase customer feedback software, and the unit on the bill is different for each of them.

Related reading

Feature request tool comparison: every tool's real price, and the unit it bills Feature request tool features, and which plan each is on Free product feedback tools and templates Feature Upvote alternatives, every published price Upvoty alternatives, and which of them cap projects Fider alternative: what self hosting Fider actually costs, and a hosted option User feedback tools, priced and sorted by what they charge for Feature request boards for B2B enterprise customers, 32 checked Feedback tool feature comparison: 32 vendors on 9 questions