Roadmunk pricing is now Tempo's pricing, on a page titled Strategic Roadmaps, and it runs on two meters rather than one. Editors are nineteen, forty nine or ninety nine dollars a month each, and reviewers past the included count are five dollars a month each.
The second meter is the one that surprises people, because most roadmap tools either charge for everybody or for nobody, and this one charges different rates for two kinds of person.
Everything below was read at tempo.io/pricing/roadmaps on 14 September 2026.
How much does Roadmunk cost?
Nineteen dollars per editor a month at the entry, and every figure on their page is billed annually.
| Plan | Per editor | Reviewers included |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $19 | 3 |
| Business | $49 | 5 |
| Professional | $99 | 10 |
| Enterprise | Custom | custom |
- Starter adds unlimited roadmaps, one way Jira, Azure DevOps and Trello syncs, unlimited shareable and interactive roadmaps without viewer limits.
- Business adds feedback and collection insights, customizable feedback portals, idea management and weighted prioritization, portfolio roadmaps, roadmap dependencies, API access tokens.
- Professional adds advanced visualizations for ideas, realtime publishing for roadmaps, on demand account usage reports, SSO, two way Jira and Azure DevOps sync.
- Enterprise adds private cloud, advanced customization.
No monthly figure is published for any plan, so a buyer who wants to pay month to month has no number to read.
Does Roadmunk have a free plan?
No. Their own page offers a fourteen day trial that covers the Business package minus API tokens, with the native Jira integration included, and there is nothing free after it.
What do five people cost?
Twenty nine dollars a month on Starter, if one of them edits and four only look.
Starter is nineteen dollars for the editor and includes three reviewers. The fourth and fifth reviewer are five dollars each, so nineteen plus ten is twenty nine dollars a month, which is three hundred and forty eight dollars a year.
Change who edits and the figure moves hard. Two editors and three reviewers is thirty eight dollars a month because the reviewers are inside the included three.
Five editors is ninety five dollars a month on Starter and four hundred and ninety five on Professional, which is five thousand nine hundred and forty dollars a year.
So the question to answer before you read their table is how many of your people need to change a roadmap rather than read one. That number decides the bill and it is not the headcount.
Is a reviewer the same as a customer?
No, and that is the limit worth knowing before you compare this to a feedback board.
A reviewer is somebody inside your account who can look at a roadmap and comment on it, and each one past the included count is five dollars a month.
A customer reading a public roadmap is not a reviewer and does not need a seat, because their own page says shareable and interactive roadmaps carry no viewer limits.
Two way Jira and Azure DevOps sync is a paid option on Business at nine dollars per collaborator a month, which is a third meter on top of the two above.
Who is Roadmunk for?
A company already buying Tempo's other products around Jira, where the roadmap is an internal planning artefact.
The product moved into a suite and its pricing moved with it, so the strongest reason to pick it is that you are already inside that suite. What that move means for a buyer who came looking for Roadmunk itself is on the alternative page.
14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.
What does the same five people cost here?
Nine dollars a month, because nobody is counted.
There is no editor rate, no reviewer rate and no viewer limit, so five people and fifty cost the same. Thirty nine adds more projects, the API, a custom domain and colleagues, and the colleague count is still not a meter.
The honest comparison is that their roadmap views are richer than ours and their integration list is longer, and that our price does not move when your team grows. The tools that meter people rather than plans are priced out in full, and both of our figures are published.