← Alternatives

Productboard alternatives, and the maker minimum

Productboard is a bigger product than ours and it is aimed at a different buyer, so most of this page is about whether you are that buyer rather than about which tool wins.

There is one thing on their pricing page worth your attention before anything else, because it changes the entry price of their middle plan by a factor of two and a half depending on which sentence you happen to read.

Everything below was read on their own pricing page on 9 September 2026, and the entry price was read again on 15 September 2026.

What are the alternatives to Productboard?

Productboard is nineteen dollars a maker billed annually, and the minimum on the plan above it is stated three different ways on the same page. The table below gives one figure and one unit per tool, which is all a comparison needs.

VendorFromBilled perFree planTrial
Trello$5/user/mouserYes–
VoteFirst$7.50/moplan–14 days, card
Features.Vote$7.50/moproject–14 days
Jira Product Discovery$10/creator/mocreator3 creators–
LoopedIn$12/moplan1 of each–
WishKit$12.50/moproject5 requests–
Sleekplan$13/moworkspace1 admin30 days, no card
Upvoty$13.50/moproject–14 days
Noora$14/moworkspace–7 days
Convas$15/motracked user25 users–
FeedBear$15/moproject–14 days
Supahub$15/moworkspace1 board10 days
ProductLift$19/moworkspace–14 days
Productboard$19/maker/momaker500 notes–
Roadmunk$19/creator/mocreator–14 days
Ducalis$20/mochangelog subscriber500 subs–
Frill$22/moworkspace–14 days
Fider$25/moworkspace250 items–
Featurebase$29/seat/moseat1 seat–
Headway$29/moplanYes–
Nolt$29/moboard––
UserJot$29/moworkspace2 boards14 days
Aha! Ideas$39/user/mouser–Yes
Savio$39/mopaid user–14 days
Beamer$49/momonthly active user1,000 MAU–
Feature Upvote$49/board/moboard–30 days
Rapidr$49/moworkspace–14 days
Suggested$49/moplan–15 days
Gleap$49/moplan–14 days
FeatureOS$50/moplan–30 days, no card
Olvy$60/moplan25 items–
AnnounceKit$39/momodule–15 days, no card
Canny$79/motracked user25 users–
LaunchNotes$249/moplan–14 days
PendoNot publishedmonthly active userBeta–
ProdPadNot publishedmodule–7 days
UserVoiceNot publishedquoted–30 days
airfocusNot publishedquoted––
ProductPlanNot publishedquoted––
Productroad$9/moplan50 users14 days, no card
Quackback$29/moplan1 board, 50 posts14 days, no card
ProdCamp$99/moplan2 admins, 1 product–
Harvestr$65/editor/moeditor–14 days
Productlane$29/user/mouser–Yes
Ideanote$6/user/mouser10 users, 250 ideas–
Craft.io$19/editor/moeditor–14 days, no card
HYPE Boards€79/moplan–14 days, no card
Noticeable$24/moplan1 project, watermarked14 days, no card

Read on each vendor's own pricing page, with the billing switch on the yearly side wherever one is published. From is the cheapest paid rate per month. What each one includes, as well as what it costs, is on one page.

What does Productboard cost?

The same two products, line by line

Read on each vendor's own pages on the date in the row above. Not published means nobody could read it on the pages opened that day, never that the feature is absent.

Per maker, which is their word for a seat.

The Productboard pricing page read 2026-09-14, priced per maker, with Essentials at nineteen dollars, Pro at fifty nine and a quoted Enterprise plan
Productboard's published prices. Read 14 September 2026.
Plan Paid yearly Paid monthly
Free $0 $0
Plus $19/maker/mo $25/maker/mo
Business $59/maker/mo $75/maker/mo
Enterprise Custom Custom

So the price is your team size multiplied by the rate. That is the whole model and it is the opposite of ours, where the number of people who can look at the feedback does not appear in the bill at all.

The free plan is real. It carries five hundred feedback notes, twenty five contributors, one teamspace and one product portal. Their fourteen day trial does not ask for a card, and their page says so in as many words.

If you would rather try the alternative than read about it, a trial runs 14 days and asks for a card at signup, and it is $9 or $39 a month after that.

How many makers do you have to buy?

Their page answers this three different ways, and the answers do not agree.

On one plan card, Business reads five makers minimum, billed annually. On another rendering of the same card, Business reads two makers minimum, billed annually.

In their full feature comparison table, the row headed Minimum makers reads Free one, Plus one, Business two online and five on contract, Enterprise five. We loaded that page eight times and counted which shape came back, because a price that changes between loads is worth measuring rather than describing.

The arithmetic is why it matters.

Reading Business, billed annually
Two makers at $59 $118/mo
Five makers at $59 $295/mo

That is a hundred and seventy seven dollars a month between two sentences on the same page.

We are not going to tell you which one is right, because we do not know and guessing would be worse than saying so. What we would do in your position is get the minimum in writing before signing anything.

Plus has a minimum of one maker in the feature table, so the nineteen dollar figure is reachable for a single person on that plan.

Is Productboard a feedback board like ours?

Not really, and this is the honest heart of the comparison.

Ours is a public page where your users vote on requests. Theirs is a product management system, where the feedback repository is one part of a larger thing that also holds strategy, roadmaps, teamspaces and prioritization for a whole department. They describe it as built for product makers and that is accurate.

They do have customer boards and a product portal, so a public facing surface exists. But you would not buy Productboard to get a voting board, any more than you would buy a car to get a radio.

A request opened on its comments tab, with the box to reply in and the comments the people who asked for it left
The comment thread, where the reason behind a vote lives.

Do they weight votes by revenue?

Not on the pages we read on 9 September 2026.

Their prioritization language is about customer value and business outcomes, with no revenue or MRR wording that we could find. That is an absence on their marketing pages rather than proof about their software, and with a product this large the sensible assumption is that it can do more than its pricing page says.

Eight of the thirty two tools we checked do ship a form of revenue weighting, so this is not a thing only we have.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.

The import connections panel, offering Stripe, Paddle and a CSV upload to pull customer revenue in
Where revenue comes from: Stripe, Paddle, or a CSV.

What is the free plan actually good for?

The free plan is good for evaluating, and running something small.

Five hundred feedback notes is a real cap and it is a cap on content rather than on people, which is easy to miss when comparing plans. Twenty five contributors is generous. One teamspace and one product portal means one product.

If you are one person with one product and you want to try the category's most established tool without paying, their free plan is a better offer than anything we have, because we do not have a free tier at all.

What this costs

Lite

$9 /mo

1 project, 1 roadmap Changelog and weighted voting No API, team or custom domain
Start the trial

Lifetime

$999 once

Everything in Pro Every future Pro feature Paid once, never renewed
Buy it outright

Fourteen day trial of Pro, card asked for at signup. Nothing here counts the people who vote, so the bill does not move when the board starts working. The long version, with what happens if you stop paying.

Does Productboard have a public roadmap, single sign on, an API and a CSV export?

Productboard carries unlimited interactive roadmaps. Productboard carries single sign on for its portal, and SAML with SCIM on its top tier. Productboard publishes an API, and the CSV Productboard exports is the list of feature requesters rather than the whole board.

Ours publishes a public roadmap with a Denied column on every plan, and signs a voter in with a token from your own application on the thirty nine dollar plan rather than with SAML.

The same board ordered by priority, which is demand divided by effort, so a smaller request with less demand sits above a large one with more
The same board, ordered by demand divided by effort.

Is there a free Productboard alternative?

Yes, several, and none of them is Productboard. Jira Product Discovery is free forever for three creators, and Productboard's free plan carries five hundred feedback notes with one teamspace and one portal.

Both were read on their own pricing pages on 14 September 2026. This product is not one of them. There is no free plan here, only a fourteen day trial that asks for a card at signup.

Is Productboard worth it, and when is it the better answer?

Three cases, and they are all about size.

You have a product team rather than a founder. Teamspaces, a shared strategy layer and per maker access exist because several product managers need to work in the same system. We have none of that and are not building it.

You need product usage data alongside feedback. Their Plus plan connects Amplitude and Mixpanel. We connect to neither, and what we do connect to is listed here.

You want the safest choice. They are the largest and most established name in this comparison, and for some buyers that is the deciding factor on its own. It is a legitimate reason and we will not pretend otherwise.

What does ours cost?

Nine dollars a month for one project, and the number of people looking at the board never changes it.

That plan is one project, one roadmap and every widget, with weighted voting included, and no API, no custom domain and no team members. Thirty nine dollars adds those. So if you need colleagues in the tool, compare their per maker rate against our thirty nine rather than against our nine.

The real difference is scope. They sell a system for running product management across a department. This is a public board that sorts requests by what the customer pays.

If the second one is the problem you have, the first one is a lot of software to buy to solve it. Every price and unit in the category is on one page.

Productboard against the others, one at a time

Ten pages here take Productboard and one rival at a time, working out where the two bills cross and what each one does with a vote from a paying customer.

Related reading

Every Canny alternative's pricing, and the unit it bills UserVoice alternatives, and all the prices they publish Productboard publishes a rate for the maker seat, and Pendo publishes none at all ProdPad builds a price in your browser, and Productboard prints one on the page airfocus routes you to a call, Productboard already put a number on the page Canny and Productboard do not bill for the same thing