← Alternatives

Pendo alternatives, and every one of them with a number

Pendo is a far bigger product than VoteFirst and it is sold to a different buyer, so the real question is whether you are that buyer rather than which tool wins.

For a lot of people arriving on this query, Pendo is the right purchase and a board is not what they needed.

There is one sentence in their own documentation that decides it for everybody else, and it is in the second section below.

Everything here was read on Pendo's own pages on 9 September 2026.

What are the alternatives to Pendo?

Pendo publishes no figure and bills on monthly active users. Almost every tool below prints a number on its own page that anybody can read without a sales call. The few that do not are marked as not published rather than guessed at.

VendorFromBilled perFree planTrial
Trello$5/user/mouserYes–
VoteFirst$7.50/moplan–14 days, card
Features.Vote$7.50/moproject–14 days
Jira Product Discovery$10/creator/mocreator3 creators–
LoopedIn$12/moplan1 of each–
WishKit$12.50/moproject5 requests–
Sleekplan$13/moworkspace1 admin30 days, no card
Upvoty$13.50/moproject–14 days
Noora$14/moworkspace–7 days
Convas$15/motracked user25 users–
FeedBear$15/moproject–14 days
Supahub$15/moworkspace1 board10 days
ProductLift$19/moworkspace–14 days
Productboard$19/maker/momaker500 notes–
Roadmunk$19/creator/mocreator–14 days
Ducalis$20/mochangelog subscriber500 subs–
Frill$22/moworkspace–14 days
Fider$25/moworkspace250 items–
Featurebase$29/seat/moseat1 seat–
Headway$29/moplanYes–
Nolt$29/moboard––
UserJot$29/moworkspace2 boards14 days
Aha! Ideas$39/user/mouser–Yes
Savio$39/mopaid user–14 days
Beamer$49/momonthly active user1,000 MAU–
Feature Upvote$49/board/moboard–30 days
Rapidr$49/moworkspace–14 days
Suggested$49/moplan–15 days
Gleap$49/moplan–14 days
FeatureOS$50/moplan–30 days, no card
Olvy$60/moplan25 items–
AnnounceKit$39/momodule–15 days, no card
Canny$79/motracked user25 users–
LaunchNotes$249/moplan–14 days
PendoNot publishedmonthly active userBeta–
ProdPadNot publishedmodule–7 days
UserVoiceNot publishedquoted–30 days
airfocusNot publishedquoted––
ProductPlanNot publishedquoted––
Productroad$9/moplan50 users14 days, no card
Quackback$29/moplan1 board, 50 posts14 days, no card
ProdCamp$99/moplan2 admins, 1 product–
Harvestr$65/editor/moeditor–14 days
Productlane$29/user/mouser–Yes
Ideanote$6/user/mouser10 users, 250 ideas–
Craft.io$19/editor/moeditor–14 days, no card
HYPE Boards€79/moplan–14 days, no card
Noticeable$24/moplan1 project, watermarked14 days, no card

Read on each vendor's own pricing page, with the billing switch on the yearly side wherever one is published. From is the cheapest paid rate per month. What each one includes, as well as what it costs, is on one page.

The same two products, line by line

Read on each vendor's own pages on the date in the row above. Not published means nobody could read it on the pages opened that day, never that the feature is absent.

What does Pendo cost?

Nobody outside Pendo can tell you, and their pricing page is straightforward about that in one sense and awkward in another.

The Pendo pricing page read 14 September 2026, four plans of which three say custom pricing and carry a request a demo button where a figure would be
Pendo's pricing page. Read 14 September 2026.

Four plans are on the page. Free, Base, Core and Ultimate. Free is free. The other three each say custom pricing, and each has a request a demo button in the place where a number would be.

The meter is monthly active users. Their own FAQ defines that as unique visitors who were active in your app over the last thirty calendar days. Not seats, not boards, not projects.

So the bill grows with how many people use your product, and not with how many people at your company touch the tool. That is a genuinely different bet from most of this category and it is worth understanding before you compare anything.

Free carries five hundred monthly active users, product analytics, in app guides, roadmaps and NPS surveys, with the roadmaps and the surveys carrying Pendo's own branding.

Two parts of that page are worth reading next to each other. Their pricing philosophy section says the pricing is clear upfront and that there is no bait and switch. The plan cards say custom pricing three times.

Both of those can be true at once, because clear upfront plausibly means clear in the quote you are handed rather than clear on the website. It is still worth knowing that you cannot compare Pendo against anything without a sales conversation first.

The same philosophy section says you get full functionality with no gated features. The comparison table further down the same page marks product discovery and sentiment as paid add ons on two of the four plans.

The resolution is the word module. You get all of a module you have bought, and the modules are bought separately. That is a coherent position and it is not what the sentence sounds like on first reading.

The whole table, the monthly active user meter and what happens when you exceed it are written out separately, because the meter is the part that decides your bill and it deserves more room than a paragraph.

The version of this argument worth having is the one you run yourself, and a trial takes 14 days and a card.

What this costs

Lite

$9 /mo

1 project, 1 roadmap Changelog and weighted voting No API, team or custom domain
Start the trial

Lifetime

$999 once

Everything in Pro Every future Pro feature Paid once, never renewed
Buy it outright

Fourteen day trial of Pro, card asked for at signup. Nothing here counts the people who vote, so the bill does not move when the board starts working. The long version, with what happens if you stop paying.

Can your customers see a Pendo roadmap?

Not today, and that answer is theirs rather than VoteFirst's.

The frequently asked questions on their roadmap product page include whether a roadmap can be made visible to customers. The answer says it cannot right now, that roadmaps created there are private or visible only to internal teams, and that they plan to add external sharing later.

If a public roadmap is what you are shopping for, that is the capability most people assume every tool in this category has.

There is a customer facing surface elsewhere in the product. An Ideas Portal is named once, on the Listen page, as a way to share where you are heading. It is a different thing from the roadmap module, and one bullet is all the detail their marketing gives it.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.

The public roadmap, four columns reading Suggested, In Review, In Progress and Completed, each card carrying its vote count and a progress bar
The public roadmap, from Suggested through to Completed.

Is Pendo a feedback board?

No, and the clearest evidence is what their own feedback page does not say.

The words portal, public, vote, voting and upvote appear nowhere on the Pendo Feedback product page. What it does contain is capture, centralise, integrate, categorise and synthesise.

Their feedback product exists to pull in what customers said somewhere else and make sense of it, rather than to run a page where customers post and vote in the open.

Votes do exist in the platform, just not there. The roadmap page says a roadmap can show total votes and dollar values against an initiative.

The Validate page says an idea test can be analysed by votes, accounts, ARR, impact and effort. So the voting lives inside the internal planning tools, attached to a roadmap the customers cannot see.

That is a coherent design. It is a product for a product department, and the customer is a research subject rather than a participant.

Whether that is right for you depends on something quite specific, which is whether you want your users to be able to read the list and argue with each other on it.

The public board as a visitor arriving from a link sees it, with the request titles, the number of people behind each one and the column each sits in
What a customer sees when they follow the link you gave them.

Does Pendo have a free plan?

Yes, in the form of the Novus beta on their pricing page read on 14 September 2026, which asks for no card. It is a beta rather than a standing tier, so it is worth checking what it still includes before you plan around it.

Does Pendo have a public roadmap and single sign on?

Pendo carries Pendo branded roadmaps as part of the wider product. Single sign on is not published anywhere on Pendo's own pages read on 14 September 2026, so nobody could read whether it exists.

VoteFirst publishes a public roadmap with a Denied column on every plan, and signs a voter in with a token from your own application on the thirty nine dollar plan rather than with SAML.

Is there a free Pendo alternative?

Yes, several, and none of them is Pendo. Jira Product Discovery is free forever for three creators, and Productboard's free plan carries five hundred feedback notes with one teamspace and one portal.

Both were read on their own pricing pages on 14 September 2026. VoteFirst is not one of them. There is no free plan here, only a fourteen day trial that asks for a card at signup.

Is Pendo worth it, and what is it genuinely better at?

Several things.

Product analytics, session replay and in app guides. That is the core of the company. VoteFirst does none of it and has no plans to.

Feedback that arrives somewhere other than a board. They ingest support tickets, call transcripts and survey responses, and integrate with Salesforce, Zendesk, Gong, Teams, Zoom and Jira. Their pricing page counts more than eighty five integrations across the platform. If your feedback is scattered across four systems and nobody has read it in a month, that is a real problem and it is not one VoteFirst solves.

Analysis of that pile. Their product summarises feedback, surfaces trends and flags duplicate ideas, and they describe all of it as AI. VoteFirst has no AI features and is not adding any, so if that analysis is the thing you are buying, buy it from them and be happy.

Scale. Pendo is sold to enterprises with compliance requirements, and their page names SOC2, GDPR and HIPAA. VoteFirst is a nine dollar board.

One voter opened, showing their votes, comments and views, when they were first and last seen, the billing system they came from, and the private notes only the team sees
One voter: what they voted for, and the revenue behind them.

Who should not move to VoteFirst?

Anybody whose actual problem is one of the four things above.

If you need to know which features get used, VoteFirst cannot tell you. If your feedback lives in Zendesk and Gong, it does not read either.

If a procurement process requires a vendor questionnaire and a named account team, VoteFirst is not that. And if you are already paying for Pendo for the analytics, adding their feedback module is a smaller decision than adding a second vendor.

The overlap between the two products is narrower than the query suggests. It is one thing, which is the list of what customers are asking for.

What does VoteFirst do instead?

One public page where your customers post, vote and see the answer.

The board is a public page and voting works without an account, so the number under a request is what people actually wanted rather than what people were willing to sign up in order to say.

The board is the whole product, and the roadmap is a page you can send somebody a link to, which is the specific thing Pendo says it does not do yet.

A vote can carry the weight of the customer who cast it, so a request from three customers paying you can outrank one from thirty who are not.

That mechanism is the closest thing to the ARR mapping on their side, and the difference is that it is visible on a page rather than in an internal planning view.

When something ships, the people who asked for it get told. Publishing a release emails the voters on the requests it contains, which is a different message from a general announcement because it is about the thing that person specifically asked for.

The price is published, which after the section above feels worth stating plainly. Nine dollars a month for one project, and thirty nine for the plan that adds more projects, the API and a custom domain.

Both numbers are on the pricing page and there is no call. A card is required for the fourteen day trial.

If you are still comparing, every tool in this category with its real billing unit is on one page, and Productboard is the closest thing to Pendo that does publish a number.

Pendo against the others, one at a time

Two pages here put Pendo against one rival at a time, each working out which bill is smaller at which size.

Related reading

Productboard alternatives, and the maker minimum UserVoice alternatives, and all the prices they publish Canny counts who joined your board, and Pendo counts who opened your app Productboard publishes a rate for the maker seat, and Pendo publishes none at all