Suggested alternatives, and the one flat price to beat

Suggested sells one plan. Forty nine dollars a month, every feature switched on, no tiers to compare and nothing held back for an enterprise call. That is a genuinely good way to sell software and it makes the comparison unusually clean, because there is only one number on their side.

Everything below was read in a browser on their own pages on 10 September 2026, and the addresses are named so you can check any of it yourself.

What are the alternatives to Suggested?

Suggested is forty nine dollars a month for one plan with everything in it, including private feedback and a custom domain that most of this table charges extra for. Here is what the rest of the market asks for the same job.

Vendor	From	Billed per	Free plan	Trial
Trello	$5/user/mo	user	Yes	–
VoteFirst	$7.50/mo	plan	–	14 days, card
Features.Vote	$9/mo	project	–	14 days
Jira Product Discovery	$10/creator/mo	creator	3 creators	–
LoopedIn	$12/mo	plan	1 of each	–
WishKit	$12.50/mo	project	5 requests	–
Sleekplan	$13/mo	workspace	1 admin	–
Upvoty	$13.50/mo	project	–	14 days
Noora	$14/mo	workspace	–	7 days
Convas	$15/mo	tracked user	25 users	–
FeedBear	$15/mo	project	–	14 days
Supahub	$15/mo	workspace	1 board	–
ProductLift	$19/mo	workspace	–	14 days
Productboard	$19/maker/mo	maker	500 notes	–
Roadmunk	$19/creator/mo	creator	–	14 days
Ducalis	$20/mo	changelog subscriber	500 subs	–
Frill	$22/mo	workspace	–	14 days
Fider	$25/mo	workspace	250 items	–
Featurebase	$29/seat/mo	seat	1 seat	–
Headway	$29/mo	plan	Yes	–
Nolt	$29/mo	board	–	–
UserJot	$29/mo	workspace	2 boards	–
Aha! Ideas	$39/user/mo	user	–	Yes
Savio	$39/mo	paid user	–	14 days
Beamer	$49/mo	monthly active user	1,000 MAU	–
Feature Upvote	$49/board/mo	board	–	30 days
Rapidr	$49/mo	workspace	–	14 days
Suggested	$49/mo	plan	–	15 days
Gleap	$49/mo	plan	–	14 days
FeatureOS	$50/mo	plan	–	30 days
Olvy	$60/mo	plan	25 items	–
AnnounceKit	$79/mo	project	–	15 days
Canny	$79/mo	tracked user	25 users	–
LaunchNotes	$249/mo	plan	–	–
Pendo	Not published	monthly active user	Beta	–
ProdPad	Not published	module	–	7 days
UserVoice	Not published	quoted	–	30 days
airfocus	Not published	quoted	–	–
ProductPlan	Not published	quoted	–	–
FeatureOS	$60/mo	plan	–	30 days, no card
Productroad	$9/mo	plan	50 users	14 days, no card
Quackback	$29/mo	plan	1 board, 50 posts	14 days, no card
ProdCamp	$99/mo	plan	2 admins, 1 product	–
Harvestr	$79/editor/mo	editor	–	14 days
Productlane	$29/user/mo	user	–	Yes
Ideanote	$6/user/mo	user	10 users, 250 ideas	–
Craft.io	$19/editor/mo	editor	–	14 days, no card
HYPE Boards	€79/mo	plan	Under 10 users	14 days, no card
Noticeable	$24/mo	plan	1 project, watermarked	14 days, no card

Read on each vendor's own pricing page, with the billing switch on the yearly side wherever one is published. From is the cheapest paid rate per month. What each one includes, as well as what it costs, is on one page.

What does Suggested cost?

The same two products, line by line

Read on each vendor's own pages on the date in the row above. Not published means nobody could read it on the pages opened that day, never that the feature is absent.

Forty nine dollars a month, and their pricing page says in as many words that there are no complicated tiered plans.

The trial is fifteen days and asks for no card. Ours asks for one, which is worth saying plainly on a page whose job is to argue for us, because a trial you can start without typing a card number is easier to start and that is a real advantage.

There is one thing about that price you should resolve with them before you buy. Their own comparison page against UserVoice still says their plans start at twenty dollars and refers to what comes with all our plans, while the pricing page sells a single plan at forty nine.

Both pages were live on 10 September 2026. We are not going to guess which one is current, and neither should you.

You can check this on a board of your own rather than take the table's word for it, and a trial is 14 days with a card at signup.

What is an active user, and where is the number?

Their documentation says the paid plan is based on active users, and we could not find the page that says how many you get.

The pricing FAQ defines the term. An active user is anyone who comments, votes or adds feedback, counted once they do one of those things.

That is a clear definition and it is the same shape as the metric that makes a feedback board suddenly expensive when it starts working, which is the thing worth understanding before you buy any of these tools.

What is missing is the quantity. The pricing page shows one price and no allowance.

The documentation index lists an entry called what is an active user, that entry has no working link, and four plausible addresses for it return a proper 404. So the term is defined and the limit is not published anywhere we could reach.

That may mean there is no cap, which would be excellent. Ask them, and get the answer in writing, because a metered term with no published meter is the one thing on any pricing page worth a direct question.

What do you get for forty nine dollars?

More than the number suggests, and the list is public.

Multiple projects, feature voting, a custom domain with SSL, single sign on, voter export, Markdown, guest feedback, email reports, portal customisation, theming, custom labels, team support and private feedback. All of it on the one plan.

Read that list against a tiered competitor and the flat price starts looking different. Several of those items are the exact things other products in this category use as the reason to move you up a plan, and on our own side three of them are.

Do they have private feedback?

Yes, and it is the part of their product we cannot match at any price.

Their permissions system, announced in October 2019, lets you restrict a piece of feedback to your team, to everyone on a given email domain, or to named individual addresses.

So you can run one portal where some items are public, some are visible only to your own staff and some are visible only to a named customer.

We have nothing like that. A board of ours is public or it is not created yet. Custom boards carry a public switch and creating them needs the higher plan, and there is no password, no invite list and no email domain rule anywhere in the product.

If feedback from a named set of stakeholders is the job, they can do it and we cannot, and that is the end of the comparison rather than the start of an argument.

The demo board is open and it asks for no account.

Does Suggested weight votes by revenue?

No, and nothing on their site claims otherwise.

There is no mention of revenue, of accounts, of tiers or of weighting on their pricing page, their product page, their documentation index or their changelog. A vote on their board is one vote, which is the same as most of this category.

Ours puts each voter in a tier, gives the tier a whole number multiplier, writes that weight onto the vote at the moment it is cast, and keeps the plain headcount visible beside the weighted total so you can always see both.

The mechanism is written out in full here. Eight of the thirty two tools we checked ship some form of it, so this is a difference between us and them rather than something only we have.

If every customer you have pays you roughly the same amount, weighting has nothing to weigh and this whole paragraph is irrelevant to you.

Is Suggested still being worked on?

The honest answer is that we cannot tell from the outside, and here is exactly what we can see.

The site is live and the pricing page still sells. The application host answers. The blog carries two posts from August 2023. The last entry on their own public changelog, which runs on their own product, is dated 24 October 2020 and announces feedback merging.

None of that proves a product is finished with. Plenty of small tools ship steadily and announce nothing, and a changelog is a marketing habit rather than a heartbeat. It also does not prove the opposite.

What it means in practice is that this is a question to put to them directly before you move a board across, and to ask in a way that gets a date rather than a reassurance.

We check this signal on every one of these pages, because a product that has stopped moving while its pricing page keeps selling is the worst thing you can accidentally buy.

We have also been wrong about it in the other direction, which is why the paragraph above lists what we saw instead of drawing a conclusion for you.

How does their moderation compare with ours?

Both hold new items until somebody approves them, and theirs is the more flexible of the two.

On their side every piece of feedback and every comment from a user goes to an inbox to be approved, and since August 2019 you can choose which content types need approving rather than approving all of them.

On ours the review gate covers suggestions, it is on by default, and there is no setting anywhere that turns it off. Ours is simpler and theirs gives you more control, and which of those you want depends on how much traffic your board actually gets.

Does Suggested have a free plan?

No. Their pricing page read on 14 September 2026 carries a fifteen day trial that asks for no card.

Does Suggested have a public roadmap, single sign on and an export?

Suggested's own words are a roadmap to excite users. Suggested includes single sign on rather than gating it behind a tier. Suggested exports its voters to CSV on the same plan.

Ours publishes a public roadmap with a Denied column on every plan, and signs a voter in with a token from your own application on the thirty nine dollar plan rather than with SAML.

Is there a free Suggested alternative?

Yes, several, and none of them is Suggested. Fider is the free one to know about, because it is open source and its hosted tier runs to two hundred and fifty feedback items.

UserJot gives two boards and three admin roles, Supahub gives one board and one admin, Featurebase gives one seat, and Sleekplan's Indie tier is a single admin workspace that does not expire.

All five were read on their own pages on 14 September 2026. This product is not one of them. There is no free plan here, only a fourteen day trial that asks for a card at signup.

Is Suggested worth it, and when is it the better answer?

Four cases, and the first one settles it on its own.

You need feedback that only some people can see. Their permissions do it and we have no equivalent at any price.

You run several products and want one bill. Multiple projects are on their single plan. Ours are on the thirty nine dollar plan.

You want a custom domain and single sign on without moving up. Both are included in their forty nine. Both are on our higher plan.

You want to try it without a card. Their trial runs fifteen days and asks for nothing. Ours asks for a card on the first day.

What does ours cost?

Nine dollars a month for one project, with weighted voting included, no widget held back for the higher plan, and the changelog and public roadmap in the same price.

Against their forty nine we are forty dollars a month cheaper, and the honest way to read that gap is as a list of things you are not buying. No private feedback. No second project until thirty nine. No custom domain until thirty nine. No colleague on the account until thirty nine.

What you are buying instead is the weighting, and a board where the plain count and the weighted total sit on the same card. Whether we are still changing the product is a question you should check rather than take our word for, and our own changelog is where to check it.

The whole category table is here if you want to see where both of us sit against the rest of it.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.