This is the feedback tool page inventory as a file. Sixty nine vendor domains in this category, one row each, carrying how many URLs each site published on 13 September 2026, how many it published on 5 October 2026, the change between them, and how many of today's URLs fall into each of eighteen path clusters.
Nobody publishes this. The sitemaps are public, every vendor serves one, and the work is enumerating sixty nine of them on two dates and sorting the result by path. Forty nine thousand seven hundred and forty three URLs came back on the second pass.
domain,urls_2026_09_13,urls_2026_10_05,change,non-english,compare,alternatives,roundup,glossary,...
ideascale.com,5448,5448,0,1430,47,4,25,0,...
aha.io,5067,5067,0,0,93,0,57,0,...
launchnotes.com,3752,3754,2,0,353,2,117,1990,...
pendo.io,3798,2921,-877,0,15,1,7,56,...
Take the file. It may be copied, quoted and used commercially with no attribution and no link back.
None of it needs attribution. If you would rather point at it than copy it, the address is https://votefirst.app/en/data/feedback-tool-page-inventory and the figures on it were read on 5 October 2026.
How big is a feedback tool website?
The median one publishes 308 pages, and the largest publishes 5,448.
IdeaScale is first at 5,448, then Aha! at 5,067, LaunchNotes at 3,754, UserGuiding at 2,951 and Pendo at 2,921. Those five carry two fifths of the category between them, 20,141 URLs of 49,743.
Below the median the drop is steep, and a long tail of vendors publishes a few dozen pages that are the product, the pricing and nothing else.
Eleven of the sixty nine returned no sitemap on either date, so their row reads zero on both. A twelfth, IdeaLift, listed 798 URLs in September and answered with a server error in October, so its row reads zero on the second date.
That is a fact about their sitemaps and not about their sites, and it is left in the file as zero rather than dropped, because dropping a vendor for being hard to enumerate is how a category count quietly becomes a count of the easy half.
What do feedback tool sites actually publish?
Blog posts, and then everything else.
Fourteen thousand and ninety three of the forty nine thousand seven hundred and forty three URLs are blog posts, which is more than a quarter of the whole category.
The next largest cluster is the one the classifier cannot name at 12,714, then non English translations at 4,522, glossary entries at 3,673 and help articles at 2,742.
The clusters this category is usually argued about are small. Comparison pages are 2,489 and alternatives pages are 738, so the two shapes that dominate every conversation about feedback tool marketing are together under one page in fifteen. Roundups are 759, pricing pages are 331, and tools are 167 across all sixty nine vendors.
Six of the fifty seven vendors that served a sitemap publish no comparison page and no alternatives page at all. The comparison pages that do exist are heavily templated, which is a separate measurement.
Which vendors publish the most of each kind?
Hellonext and FeatureOS tie at 393 comparison pages each, and the tie is the finding.
Those two domains serve the same sitemap, so the category's largest comparison inventory is one set of pages published at two addresses. LaunchNotes is next at 353 and Astuto at 350.
Featurebase leads the alternatives cluster at 224, which is more than the next four vendors together. Unwrap leads roundups at 132 and LaunchNotes follows at 117.
Four of the fifty seven vendors with a sitemap name no pricing page in it, which does not mean they publish no price. What each vendor charges and what it charges per is read separately from the pricing pages themselves.
What this costs
Lite
$9 /mo
Pro
$39 /mo
Lifetime
$999 once
Fourteen day trial of Pro, card asked for at signup. Nothing here counts the people who vote, so the bill does not move when the board starts working. The long version, with what happens if you stop paying.
What changed in three weeks?
Thirty six of the sixty nine changed their URL count, and three of them account for more than the whole net drop.
The category went from 51,493 URLs on 13 September to 49,743 on 5 October. Gleap, whose address now redirects to gleap.ai, listed 974 fewer, with its integration pages cut from 1,010 to 179. Pendo listed 877 fewer, almost all of them from its blog section, and IdeaLift's 798 went with the server error noted above.
Twenty seven vendors grew. Ducalis added 514, 341 of them under its idea path and 105 under app requests. AnnounceKit went from 91 URLs to 329, adding 131 blog posts, 50 glossary entries, 31 alternatives pages and 21 comparison pages. Enterpret added 83 guides and Formbricks 66 blog posts.
Three weeks is still a short window, and the change column records what moved rather than a trend. What it does show is one vendor tripling its sitemap in exactly the page shapes this file counts.
How was this built, and when does it change?
By reading sixty nine robots files, following every sitemap they name, and sorting the URLs by path.
rival-map.py sitemaps in this project's own research directory does the enumeration, following up to three hundred sitemap files per domain, and inventory-dataset.py reads the two saved snapshots and writes the CSV.
The eighteen clusters are regular expressions over the URL path, so a page that names itself something unusual lands in the cluster called other, which is why that cluster is the second largest.
The refresh rule is one enumeration per quarter, and the next is due on 5 January 2027.
Who is this dataset for?
Anybody sizing this category before they decide how much of it to read.
If you are shopping rather than counting, the prices for thirty two of those vendors are published as a second file, and their positions on the web's link graph are a third. Every heading at least two of them write is counted in a fourth, and which of the software directories listing them passes ranking credit is a fifth.
14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.