← Alternatives

Featurebase bills your team, UserJot barely bills anyone at all

Featurebase charges by seat, one line for every colleague who touches the board. UserJot charges by workspace, one flat price that does not move whether three people use it or thirty. Everything below was read on each vendor's own pricing page on 15 September 2026.

What does each one charge?

Twenty nine dollars a seat, twenty nine dollars flat, and nine, and only one of those figures grows with your own headcount.

VendorFromBilled perFree planTrial
VoteFirst$7.50/moplan14 days, card
Featurebase$29/seat/moseat1 seat
UserJot$29/moworkspace2 boards

Read on each vendor's own pricing page on 2026-09-15.

The UserJot prices read 2026-09-14 on their home page, because their pricing path answers 404, showing Free at nothing, Starter at twenty nine dollars a month and Professional at fifty nine
UserJot's published prices. Read 14 September 2026.

Featurebase's own card also carries a switch, defaulted to billed yearly, that turns twenty nine dollars a seat into thirty seven the moment you pay monthly instead.

UserJot's pricing lives on its home page rather than on a dedicated pricing path, because that path returns a plain 404, and there is no annual rate printed anywhere on the page we read.

Featurebase meters your colleagues. UserJot prices the workspace and leaves your headcount out of the sum entirely. That is the whole difference this page exists to work through.

How much does Featurebase cost compared to UserJot?

It depends on two numbers at once, how many colleagues you pay for and how many boards you run, and the second one decides more than the first.

Your situation Featurebase UserJot
3 people on the team, 1 board $87/mo, three seats on Growth Free, one board is inside the two board line
8 people on the team, 3 boards $232/mo, eight seats on Growth, which allows five boards $29/mo, Starter, a flat rate regardless of headcount
15 people on the team, 6 boards $885/mo, fifteen seats on Professional, needed once boards pass five $59/mo, Professional, unlimited boards

UserJot's free line holds at two boards no matter how many colleagues sit behind it, so an eight person company above pays the same twenty nine dollars a two person company would pay for a third board.

Featurebase's seat price keeps climbing whatever the board count is, so its bill is the one that actually tracks your team.

UserJot never prints an annual rate, so every figure above for it is the plain monthly one. There is no cheaper switch to flip.

If you would rather look at a board than read about billing, the demo is open without an account.

Which one should you choose?

They solve different weak points and the honest answer names something real about both.

UserJot's free plan is not a shape of a trial with a cap you hit in a week. It holds two boards and unlimited users with no card and no end date. For a small team starting a first board, that is a complete answer rather than a taste of one.

Featurebase's revenue signal sits on Growth at twenty nine dollars a seat rather than behind a sales call, syncing a customer's spend and company name into the board in a way UserJot's own pages never describe doing.

Choose Featurebase if you want that signal attached to every request from day one. Choose UserJot if your team is small, your board count will stay under three, and you want to add a colleague without a bill following them.

Why choose Featurebase over UserJot, or UserJot over Featurebase?

Because one prices the people on your team and the other prices almost nothing about them at all.

Choose Featurebase when you expect a data signal per customer, since Growth pulls in spend and company name to sort requests by revenue, and that exists on their product and not on the other.

Choose UserJot when your team is going to grow faster than your board count, because a flat workspace price does not rise with a sixth or a tenth colleague the way a seat price does.

The real question is which number in your own company moves faster, seats or boards, and everything else on either page follows from that.

Fourteen days of Pro, a card at signup, then nine or thirty nine a month.

Is there a cheaper alternative to both?

Against Featurebase's per seat rate, a flat price is cheaper the moment a company adds colleagues faster than it adds boards.

Against UserJot's own flat rate, almost nothing in this category beats free for two boards, so the comparison only starts once a third board, a custom domain or a login through your own identity provider is needed.

The calculator works out both meters at a size you choose, and the whole field with the unit each vendor bills on is one page. Ours is nine dollars flat for one project, whatever your team size or board count.

What does each do with a vote from a big customer?

Featurebase ties a request to a customer's revenue and lets you filter by it. UserJot's own pages do not mention revenue, a tier or a vote weight anywhere.

Vendor Weighting by revenue API Export Custom domain
Featurebase Growth, syncs a customer's spend and company name Growth, with MCP and webhooks Growth
UserJot Starter
VoteFirst All plans Pro CSV Pro

Read on each vendor's own pricing page on 2026-09-15. A dash means the page opened that day did not print an answer, never that the feature is missing.

Featurebase's own words are to tie feedback to revenue and filter by it, which orders a list rather than changing the weight of a single vote. Neither of this pair multiplies a vote by what its owner pays us.

One request opened, showing seventy eight votes becoming a hundred and ninety eight weighted votes, and the tier split behind them at Free one times, Pro three and Enterprise five
One request opened: seventy eight votes become a hundred and ninety eight.

Can I move from one to the other?

Neither vendor's pages we read for this comparison describe a self serve export, so leaving either one usually means writing to support rather than pressing a button.

What tends to disappear on a move between any pair of tools in this category is who cast each vote rather than the running total, the comment threads under a request, and any board link a customer already bookmarked.

We are not going to describe what either export actually contains beyond that. We have not read documentation stating it for either product, and guessing would be exactly the kind of number this page refuses to invent.

Where we fit, and where we do not

We are one module, a public board with a roadmap. Neither of the two products above stops there, and both have something real that we do not.

Both carry a free plan. Featurebase's is one seat with uncapped end users and uncapped feedback. UserJot's is two boards with unlimited users and three admin roles. We have no free plan at any price.

Both also put single sign on behind an identity provider on a paid tier, Featurebase's on Enterprise and UserJot's on Professional. Ours signs a voter in with a token your own application issues, on the thirty nine dollar plan, which answers a different question than a company directory login does.

What this product does instead is put a whole number multiplier on a tier, write that weight onto the vote the moment it is cast, and show the plain count beside the weighted total, on the nine dollar plan as well as the thirty nine dollar one.

What is Featurebase, and what is UserJot?

Featurebase is a feedback board sold together with a help desk, a changelog and a survey module under one login, billed by the seat.

UserJot is a workspace based feedback board with a roadmap and a changelog built in from the free plan up, priced by the workspace rather than by the person, with unlimited users on every tier including the free one.

Does either one have a free plan?

Both do, and they hold different things. Featurebase's pricing page read on 15 September 2026 gives one seat with uncapped end users and uncapped feedback. UserJot's, read on 14 September 2026, gives two feedback boards, three admin roles and unlimited users, with no card and no end date.

What this costs

Lite

$9 /mo

1 project, 1 roadmap Changelog and weighted voting No API, team or custom domain
Start the trial

Lifetime

$999 once

Everything in Pro Every future Pro feature Paid once, never renewed
Buy it outright

Fourteen day trial of Pro, card asked for at signup. Nothing here counts the people who vote, so the bill does not move when the board starts working. The long version, with what happens if you stop paying.

The honest summary

Featurebase's bill tracks your colleagues and hands you a revenue signal on the cheapest paid plan. UserJot's bill barely moves at all until you need a third board, a custom domain, or a login through your own identity provider.

A small team that will stay small pays UserJot nothing for a long time. A team that is going to grow, or that wants requests sorted by what a customer is worth, pays Featurebase instead and gets that sorting on Growth.

The Featurebase alternative page and the UserJot one carry each side on its own.

14 days, a card at signup, then $9 or $39 a month.

Related reading

Featurebase alternatives, every published price on one page UserJot alternatives, and every free plan in the market Every feedback tool's real price, and the unit it bills